|
DC Universe [all categories]
![]() DC Universe Archives
![]() Questions for Bob Greenberger (Page 40)
|
This topic is 41 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: Questions for Bob Greenberger |
|
samdhi Member |
quote: Okay, I'll bite. I'd love to see a collection of "Terror" (# 137-141), myself. It's a direct sequel to "Prey," which has already been collected (but is now, I think, out of print). It offers Batman, Catwoman, Hugo Strange, and the Scarecrow in a wonderfully macabre story from a classic creative team (Doug Moench & Paul Gulacy). The recent "Blink" (# 156-58) is already getting a sequel. They'd make a convenient collection together. "Heat" (# 46-49) is an old favorite, and though it's probably a lost cause by now, I'll offer it up all the same. IP: Logged |
|
Mike Falcon Member |
Bob, has there ever been any serious discussion about a western Archive? Has one ever almost made the cut? IP: Logged |
|
James Friel Member |
Part 2 of the above question: it can probably be assumed that Jonah Hex, with ite spaghetti-gothic sensibility, will be archived one day--but what about one of the more traditional DC western series from the late '40s-to-early '60s period--Johnny Thunder leaps to mind. IP: Logged |
|
samdhi Member |
quote: I'd concur with this. I'd like to see something besides crossovers and one-of-kind runs like Loeb/Lee get a chance to be collected. Now that Ed Brubaker is on board as the regular writer of DETECTIVE COMICS, it might be worth collecting his first storyline, "Dead Reckoning" (# 777-82), at the earliest convenience, testing its reception as compared with trades of other titles. IP: Logged |
|
Schatzie Member |
quote:
IP: Logged |
|
Tom Fury Member |
I like the idea of "Blink" being put in trade form... Dennis O'Neil Green Arrow team-ups in Legends of the DCU #7-9 and Legends of the Dark Knight #127-131 is another suggestion... if Kevin Smith Brave & The Bold comes out, it may be a good idea. IP: Logged |
|
Owen Cardiff Darcy Member |
quote: I liked the Miller cover. I wish he'd do one for Superboy Vol. 1, too. Anyway, future Supergirl Archives covers probably will have Mooney covers -- either new art by him, if it's available, or illustrations reprinted from one of the interior stories. IP: Logged |
|
gothcityfan Member |
quote: Oh, cool, sam's here. Didn;t see you post here earlier. As for Dead Reckoning being a good test, not that i wouldn't like to see it collected, but id guess Greg Rucka's Evolution already could have made a good test. How did it do? I m assuming it did well, b/c it was a good story by a good writer on a good character, so im assuming ppl picked it up. IP: Logged |
|
dnewton Member |
Bob: quote: Well it's annoying you left out the Harley Quinn 1-shot, Batman 570 & Detective 737 because they're very important for Volume 5 (the cover with The Joker in the background). IP: Logged |
|
Bob Greenberger Member |
Long ago, DC did enter into a deal with Longmeadow Press, the publishing arm of B. Dalton. They did a collection of Joker stories and a compelte Frank Miller Batman collection. Since then, we've prefered handling such porjects ourselves, not only to retain all the revenue, but to give us totaly control over the content, look and price. Marvel's exclusive deal for the Masterwork reprints with B&N must make sense to them financially, although I'm scratching my head at how they can do a 256 page tpb for $12.95 and make a profit. Wish the web site indicated contents or showed the trade dress, but I think we're all assuming these are the first volumes of the various characters. If B&N is publishing these, it's in their best interest to display these for the casual consumer which can only help Marvel and comics in general. Dale selects the best possible image for the Archives covers and when possible, gets someone like Jerry Ordway to come in and reink it for clarity. If we go with a new image, it's for a specific reason as happened with Supergirl and will happen again with a book coming this summer. Pencils came in last week and wow, the guy can still draw! The DC CHALLENGE never comes up as a serious collection suggestion. Despite it featuring some top creators and favorite characters, it just doesn't make sense. The idea behind the project was sound and fun, but it was a side job to everyone and it languished in Dick Giordano's office. At some point, Dick asked me to help him keep it on track and before I knew it, I was editing. One of the first things I had to do was ask Gil Kane to accept an inker on #4. He was gracious and Klaus Janson did a great job. By then, though, Paul Levitz was getting impatient to see this either published or killed. I was told I needed three scripts in a month or the project was dead. Well, thanks to the interest of the talent, issues #6-8 got done in a month and it was a breathless experience. It could not have been done, I should point out, without the early forms of IM and e-mail. I remember working out drafts of #8 with Gerry Conway on MCI Mail and plotting #7 with Paul Kupperberg and Joe Staton (who was up for anything as long as he didn't have to draw horses). By the time we got to #12, Mark Evanier had to flowchart everything and I recall standing in my kitchen having him explain it all and how it was to be broken down for multiple artists. Breathless and fun, yes. A succees? Less so. Our Batman trades seem to work best with complete stories so the last few years there have been big event storylines and then some breather stories and it's those breather stories that make for a tougher collection. The LOTDK suggestions and the Brubaker one have been duly noted. Thanks to all. Yeah, we've only pitched one western archive and it was Jonah Hex. No one seems to ready to touch the 1970s yet so we'll see. Onward to 1000. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Owen Cardiff Darcy Member |
quote: Which guy? Mooney? (Please say Mooney.) IP: Logged |
|
samdhi Member |
quote: I hadn't. I've lurked on this thread for some time, though, since it's such a great source of information.
quote: Only in a very general sense, and the fact that EVOLUTION was never followed up on doesn't suggest results you or I would be happy with. (Sales may not have been the only factor, though.) I point towards Brubaker's first arc because, agree with it or not, part of DC's marketing strategy is to use TPBs to support current runs; that's why there aren't new collections of Mark Waid's FLASH, despite the apparent desire (on this board, at least) for a couple storylines in particular. I'm not opposed to going back and filling out more of Rucka's 'TEC run, but I just don't see that in the cards right now. IP: Logged |
|
Mike Falcon Member |
quote: Bring on the Hex! IP: Logged |
|
Coleo Member |
quote: Funny, the Evolution TPB was the first DCU-based Batman story I'd bought since about 1986. I was curious about the color-keying experiment (which I liked), I trusted the creators involved, and it looked fairly self-contained. Too bad there hasn't been a follow-up. Cole IP: Logged |
|
stoter1 Member |
Hey Bob: Are there max and min page number requirements for archives? I mean, is there a minimum number of pages that an archive must contain, and is there a maximum number of pages that an archive can exceed. I'm not talking about the challengers reduced pagination, but for the standard archive, have you settled on any particular numbers because archives used to be much longer. Is this trend to continue? Also, and I have been very hesitant about asking this question, but is there going to be a price hike in the nea future? The fact that DC is tinkering with the format by reducing the price on the challengers book suggests to me that DC is contemplating a possible price hike. To the extent that you can comment, please do. IP: Logged |
|
Zero Lad Member |
quote: Easy. All of the restoration work is done. All Marvel has to do is provide them with the film and they're in business. Plus, they don't have to give the distributor a cut, since they are the distributor. That's a lot of money saved right there.
quote: That doesn't explain why the cover to the next Legion archives is so muddy. It's like the old cover wasn't even scanned at a high resolution before certain parts of it were blown up. IP: Logged |
|
DaBubba Member |
Re: Cost to B&N of reprinting Marvel Masterworks. B&N also has their own print-on-demand service for self-publishers called iUniverse. (www.iuniverse.com, for those interested). From what I've read of it, the press reads the book info electronically and feeds it right into an all-in-one printer/bindery. They can pop out a normal text paperback extremely quickly. IP: Logged |
|
BearPaws Member |
quote: But the cover to the next Legion volume hasn't even been properly published yet. You're probably looking at a low-res scan, distributed to various online/preview sites and therefore doesn't have to be publisher-quality (or possibly a low-res copy of a higher-res scan). ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Teisto Member |
Bob, Any chance we could see GRIP: THE STRANGE WORLD OF MEN, VERTIGO POP! TOKYO, and POP! LONDON collected down the road? I think all three of these could do really well in bookstore sales. Thank you for your time! Teisto IP: Logged |
|
Ruiner Member |
Bob, You said after Critical Condition DC'll be doing President Lex. How about Emperor Joker/Superman:Arkham? And what issues will Pres. Lex collect exactly? IP: Logged |
|
XXXenophile Member |
quote: Well I remember going nuts when I found a complete set of the series for sale at the comic shop one day. (I had somehow randomly picked up a copy of #12 and had been wondering for the longest time what had been going on.) Best part was when the letter column for the final issue which was the fans essentially BASHING DC for even putting this series out and making fun of the "Eli Ellis" answer. One guy even detailed every plot discrepancy from every issue which was downright hilarious. I'm still looking for the "This story takes place before Crisis" notation that was said to be in the book. :-) IP: Logged |
|
Texcap Member |
In all honesty, these are the types of threads that demonstrate how useful message boards have the potential to be. Thanks for all the great reading, and I'm really looking forward to picking up more of these Archive editions, at least as my poor wallet can afford them. I'm relatively new to these editions, and only have about 5 of them currently, but with Silver Age Adam Strange material up for consideration, and the handful of titles I'm already attempting to collect (All-Star Comics, Superman, Captain Marvel (SHAZAM!), etc.), I've got my work cut out for me. Great ideas all around folks! ------------------ Visit the JSA/All-Star board at: IP: Logged |
|
Scippio Member |
I wanted to jump in on the topic of TPBs and when and how to collect them. The way I see it there are two markets for TPBs, the current comic readers, and the casual readers who come from the Bookstore channel and are probably reading Manga right now. For the current reader crowd I think for the most part people buy either TPBs or the single issues, only in rare circumstances does anybody buy both. I also believe that people who aren’t sure about a series are more likely to try it out by sampling a TPB since it offers a complete story in one sitting, instead of just one chapter in a larger story. For this crowd collecting selected story arcs and skipping around in the chronology of the series isn’t a big deal, since if they like it they will go to a comic shop or convention and track down back issues and pickup the monthly if no further collections are forthcoming. This is why I think that Marvel’s quick solicits aren’t a big deal, because the people buying the trade probably wouldn’t have bought the singles anyway. However for the casual bookstore crowd, the people already reading Manga, or the person who saw the latest Batman movie and thought they would go check out the GN section at their local Borders, this approach probably doesn’t work as well. Lets start with the person going in after seeing the latest Batman film, when s/he gets to the GN section what is s/he going to see. The Archives which are in chronological order and nicely labeled but cost $50, and a couple random TPBs collecting NML, BW:M/F, and some older X-overs. There is no clear chronology, where do they start? Do you really expect someone who may have never read a Batman comic to be able to pickup NML or BW:M/F and know what is going on, not to mention the 3 years of continuity between the end on NML and the start of BW:M/F with only one other TPB between them? Then you have the Manga buyer, these people are already conditioned to stop by the bookstore every so often and look for the newest volume of the story they are reading. These people expect for the first volume in a series to be labled Vol 1 and they expect Vol 2 to be a continuation of Vol 1. Now lets say these people saw the latest Batman movie and wanted to give some American comics a shot. What book do they start with? Both Marvel and CrossGen are addressing these groups of people. CrossGen is collecting, in order, all of their series and is clearly labeling their books vol 1, 2, 3, etc. Marvel is doing something similar. In their long running series they picked a point and started from there and called it vol 1 and each successive volume collects the next set of issues, not skipping over any. They unfortunately are not collecting all of their series, but what they are they are doing right. The Manga crowd knows that if they want to try Spiderman, they can pick up Ultimate Spiderman V1, or Amazing Spiderman V1, and they can see that V2 of both series continues from where V1 left off. Vertigo does this beautifully, but the DCU books are sorely lacking in this regard. I think that DC’s approach of collecting only selected story arcs and X-overs makes sense if they only want to consistently sell to the current readership. If they want to expand their readership to get some of these Manga buyers, or the casual reader that might stop by the local Borders, then they need to start putting out sequential trades. Does anybody think that I am off base here? I'm very intereseted in what the rest of you think. I find that DC is very arbitrary in their coices of what to collect and I think that it hurts them outside of the direct market. I have turned a couple friends onto Marvel, CrossGen, and a few Vertigo books through trades. These people are not going to go into a comic shop anytime soon, so if these trades weren't coming out they wouldn't be reading these stories. IP: Logged |
|
James Friel Member |
I think you're right. In particular, I think that especially if it really is true that most buyers either get the single issues or the traeds but not both, it's silly for DC to give any weight whatever to whether a particular creative team is at present (and for maybe the next 10 minutes, in current practice) working on the monthly title in considering material for reprinting in trade form. Only the merits of the material in itself (which of course includes saleability), and its relation to the overall continuity, should be considered. And yes, leaving out issues because they don't fit into a story arc is ridiculous. IP: Logged |
|
DStepp Member |
ME IP: Logged |
This topic is 41 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
Copyright © 2003 DC Comics
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
DC COMICS PRIVACY INFORMATION
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47