DC Universe     [all categories]
  DC Universe Archives
  Legion Archives Vol. 12 (Page 15)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 17 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Legion Archives Vol. 12
TheRogueLegionnaire
Member
posted April 17, 2003 08:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for TheRogueLegionnaire        Reply w/Quote
Dean,

That sounds ghastly. I think I'l hold off buying it until they do a new edition (like they have on so many other volumes with errors of this nature). If I have to wait till after 13 comes out then so be it.

IP: Logged

Dean Lee
Member
posted April 17, 2003 12:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dean Lee   Click Here to Email Dean Lee        Reply w/Quote
I emailed Bob, and he promptly replied. He apologized for my disappointment, and said he forwarded my message to Dale Crain, the editor in question.

Thank you, Bob, for the quick and professional response!

I'll be hoping and waiting to hear from Dale.

IP: Logged

Kamandi Last Boy on Earth
Member
posted April 17, 2003 12:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Kamandi Last Boy on Earth        Reply w/Quote
I'm very dissappointed to hear about these errors. I've been holding off on Legion until it reached the Grell era. Now I think I'll just give it a miss.

IP: Logged

outpost2
Member
posted April 17, 2003 01:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for outpost2        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dean Lee:
I emailed Bob, and he promptly replied. He apologized for my disappointment, and said he forwarded my message to Dale Crain, the editor in question.

Thanks for taking the initiative, Dean. Perhaps they will re-issue a new volume 12 as they did volume 10 (although I seriously doubt this will happen). At the very least, I hope they never let this particular colorist near another Archive again (assuming it was indeed the colorist's fault). At $50 a pop, we have the right to hold high expectations.

IP: Logged

Dean Lee
Member
posted April 17, 2003 04:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dean Lee   Click Here to Email Dean Lee        Reply w/Quote
Dale emailed me. He did say that the colorist in question will not be used again. Although this doesn't repair the errors in the book, it does present an indication that future editions just might be handled with more care. That, ultimately, is what I'm after. (Though re-doing #12 shouldn't be out of the question.)

IP: Logged

DStepp
Member
posted April 17, 2003 05:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DStepp   Click Here to Email DStepp        Reply w/Quote
This is being blown way way way out of proportion. I am looking at the original tabloid and the Archive reconstruction right now. The differences are trivial. Very very trivial. The original colors (at least on my copy) are somewhat brighter but otherwise I don't see a single difference. Try to wrap your mind around the idea that the color production of original books has variation due to the old style printing and made errors too. It's possible the colorist did his job perfectly and had a bad copy. In general, the book has very few errors despite their being literally thousands of characters and objects to be colored. In no way shape or form does this merit a reprinting.

D.

IP: Logged

Dean Lee
Member
posted April 18, 2003 02:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dean Lee   Click Here to Email Dean Lee        Reply w/Quote
I don't know what merits a re-printing, but I do know that several pages of the book have at least a minor error on them. In fact, I went ahead and started noting them. Between pages 9 and 47, I found 8 pages that didn't have a coloring mistake. That's fine if minor errors don't bother you, but minor error after minor error after minor error really starts to bug me. Yes, there are millions of details to get right, but isn't that the duty of a professional colorist? And speaking of which, Dale Crain did email me back, basically letting me know that a new colorist will be used in the future. Seems like an appropriate decision.

IP: Logged

Dean Lee
Member
posted April 18, 2003 02:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dean Lee   Click Here to Email Dean Lee        Reply w/Quote
Oh, I guess I already mentioned the thing about the new colorist...

As for the reproduction of the tabloid art, I haven't gotten to a full scale critique of that particular image, but the parts of it that were put on the book's slipcover indicate to me that the re-inking was done very poorly. Most of the charm of Grell's original linework is homogenized into a very bland, poorly detailed representation of the Legionnaires.

It seems like you and I have different standards, DStepp. I'm glad you're happy with the book, hopefully you can relax and enjoy the stories. I'm still working through that. I think once I identify all the mistakes, I'll no longer be surprised by them, and will be able to look past them as I read the stories. Venting all this has been very helpful to me.

In case anyone is curious, I have such a critical eye because I'm an artist myself, and try to get the details right when drawing such things. I also like to do digital coloring (with Photoshop) so, I actually do what I'm criticizing.

IP: Logged

poverty lad
Member
posted April 18, 2003 02:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for poverty lad   Click Here to Email poverty lad        Reply w/Quote
Don't apologize, Dean. For $50 a pop, I think we should be able to make any dissatisfaction with the product heard. I have to give props to Bob and dale for their responses. Myself, I'll be waiting for a corrected release before I order #12 (and 9!) from Amazon.

IP: Logged

DStepp
Member
posted April 18, 2003 03:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DStepp   Click Here to Email DStepp        Reply w/Quote
If I were in Crain's shoes, I would tell you that to shut you up. I would suggest to you that there is a line between critique and obessession and you are the wrong side of that line. Since you seem to need such things, allow me to the offer you the oppurtunity to compile a list of the "defects" you have found and present them to this group. Be thorough. Don't come back til you're through.

D.

IP: Logged

BearPaws
Member
posted April 18, 2003 03:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BearPaws        Reply w/Quote
Dean, I haven't read my copy yet, but I'm curious to know how extensive the problems are too.

I'm just not so rude as to tell you to go away until you satisfy my petty desires.

------------------
"I knew I wasn't risking my secret identity with you! After all,
     if I can't trust the President of the United States, who can I trust?"
• Superman to JFK, Action Comics #309, February 1964

IP: Logged

Dean Lee
Member
posted April 18, 2003 04:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dean Lee   Click Here to Email Dean Lee        Reply w/Quote
I don't care for DStepp's rudeness, but it doesn't make any difference. Now that I've started my own personal edit of the coloring in this edition, I do plan on posting my findings. I figure that's fair since some people have actually said they'd pass on this one based on what I've said. Yes, some of the mistakes are minor, and I'd like others to be able to decide for themselves if they're negligable or not. Oh, and I'll still pop in and out here at the boards until then.

IP: Logged

MLLASH
Member
posted April 18, 2003 05:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for MLLASH   Click Here to Email MLLASH        Reply w/Quote
Having Lightning Lad colored with Brainiac 5's skin and hair is NOT minor. It's HUGE MAJOR.

A costume that has ALWAYS been green is now brown? HUGE MAJOR.

I know there's a LOT to know in the Legion-verse, but a FAN *would* know.

Dean has every right to be outraged, as does ANY Legion fan, and I support him 100% in this.

IP: Logged

Miss Understood
Member
posted April 18, 2003 07:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Miss Understood        Reply w/Quote
Well I finally got Legion Archives #12 and I must say I'm in total agreement w/ Mr. Lee- The coloring errors are so numerous, it's impossible not to notice them.
How DC would publish a $50. book in this condition is beyond me.
Even the cover gallery on the last pages has coloring errors!

IP: Logged

Joe Pacheco
Member
posted April 18, 2003 10:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Joe Pacheco   Click Here to Email Joe Pacheco        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by MLLASH:
[B]Having Lightning Lad colored with Brainiac 5's skin and hair is NOT minor. It's HUGE MAJOR.

A costume that has ALWAYS been green is now brown? HUGE MAJOR.

[B]


It's hard enough for newer Legion fans to keep track of all the characters. Errors like these are very dissapointing.

IP: Logged

DStepp
Member
posted April 18, 2003 10:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for DStepp   Click Here to Email DStepp        Reply w/Quote
I am going to stick my neck out here and say that 99.99% of the characters are colored correctly. I recommend that DC give the people bithcing about this 0.01% of their money back at once! A half pence for everybody!

D.

IP: Logged

Wayne1776
Member
posted April 18, 2003 11:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Wayne1776   Click Here to Email Wayne1776        Reply w/Quote
Dean, I have most of the Archives that are currently available so far. I am sure I w
will have a complete set in a few months as my fortunes have just changed. (New job - new town.)
The LSH ARCHIVES V. 12 just went from "must have" down to "whenever" on my buy list mainly due to your posts. Thanks.

Ignore flamers -

Wayne

IP: Logged

matlock
Member
posted April 19, 2003 01:06 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for matlock   Click Here to Email matlock        Reply w/Quote
DStepp, where is this hostility coming from? Dean is a loyal and enthusiastic Legion fan who just laid down $50 for material that I can almost guarantee you that he already owned. Why? Because there's an expectation that the Archive editions are worth the hefty price tag because we as consumers will be getting full value for our dollars by getting a product that is accurate to the source material in a durable, attractive format.

Dean seems not to feel this happened, and he responded in absolutely the most appropriate way possible: he took his complaint to DC and made his fellow fans aware of the problems as he sees them. That's how you get results as a consumer in a free market. As far as I've seen, Dean hasn't called for a boycott, or demanded a reprint or even asked for his money back.

Maybe because Dean has put his neck out on the line the next archive that you buy that means as much to you as this one did to him, you will be fortunate enough to get a product you are happy with. Maybe you should appreciate someone who's trying to solve a problem, instead of acting like you have been.

Matt

IP: Logged

Trans-Fatty Acids
Member
posted April 19, 2003 01:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Trans-Fatty Acids   Click Here to Email Trans-Fatty Acids        Reply w/Quote
I leafed through the open display copy at my comic shop and just from a quick scan I noticed Cosmic Boy with a reverse-redneck tan on the cover of DC Super Stars (his skin is pink except for his pale neck), Dream Girl's bare legs are colored white as if she were in pants in her story (except for a couple of panels where they are flesh toned), Light Lass goes from blonde to redhead and back to blonde in the Grimbor story as does Sun Boy in all his appearances, and lastly poor Lightning Lad's hair goes through the previously mentioned colors plus a mousy brown to boot!
I won't even mention Ultra Boy's Emerald Dragon emblem colored to resemble a mud dragon or Lightning Lad's "now they're white, now they're blue" gloves.
Thanks for the heads up, Dean. You saved me $50 dollars.

T-FA

IP: Logged

Dean Lee
Member
posted April 19, 2003 06:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Dean Lee   Click Here to Email Dean Lee        Reply w/Quote
Thanks for the support, folks!
Actually, I do want this to become an issue of pure facts, not opinion and emotion. I'm still working on the analysis of the errors. When I'm done, I will post them both here and at the Legion board. I do take this as a responsibility now that I've posted my opinions on the matter. Hang in there!

IP: Logged

DStepp
Member
posted April 19, 2003 07:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for DStepp   Click Here to Email DStepp        Reply w/Quote
A major struggle in life is for perspective. Yes, there are art errors. There are art errors in the others too. There were art errors in the Golden Age material you're just not saavy enough to know where to look because the material is so old. There were art errors in the originals too. My copy of All-Star Squadron Annual #3 has everyone's face painted green.

1) These are reprints. They are not perfect. If you want true blue original, go buy NM copies of the originals. Contrary to the flapping on that goes around here, a full set of NM copies of those books will cost a lot more than $35.

2) The colorist got 99.99% of the characters and objects correct. He might have failed 0.01% of the time. I seriously doubt you could do a whole lot better, esp on a deadline. Recognizing that this is basically an inexpensive reprint series, I can live with 99.99% correct. (It's inexpensive in relative terms. People who can't afford $35 because they don't have a job don't get to decide what 'expensive' is.).

3) DC should always strive for the highest quality. We should encourage them, not punish them, when they hit the 99.99% mark. If you want no program at all, encourage people not to buy the Archives. If you're an intelligent, realistic person who appreciates high-quality reprints at a reasonable price, I recommend you spend your $35 of Legion Archives #12.

D.

IP: Logged

JayFlip
Member
posted April 19, 2003 08:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for JayFlip        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dean Lee:
I don't care for DStepp's rudeness, but it doesn't make any difference. Now that I've started my own personal edit of the coloring in this edition, I do plan on posting my findings. I figure that's fair since some people have actually said they'd pass on this one based on what I've said. Yes, some of the mistakes are minor, and I'd like others to be able to decide for themselves if they're negligable or not. Oh, and I'll still pop in and out here at the boards until then.

Dean, thanks for posting your observations. I have all of the Legion archives and plan on purchasing vol. 12 despite any coloring errors, but it's still good to have this information. I don't think it's nit-picking at all - the core audience for the archives is made up of fans and collectors who notice exactly the kind of errors you've pointed out. Other coloring issues have been debated extensively on other threads, BTW.

I look forward to reading your compiled list, and thank you for pointing out the errors to Dale Crain.

- Jay

IP: Logged

The Old Guy
Member
posted April 19, 2003 10:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for The Old Guy        Reply w/Quote
DStepp:

Spoken like a true bean-counter!!!

The Old Guy

IP: Logged

DWM
Member
posted April 19, 2003 10:23 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for DWM   Click Here to Email DWM        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by DStepp:
2) The colorist got 99.99% of the characters and objects correct. He might have failed 0.01% of the time. I seriously doubt you could do a whole lot better, esp on a deadline. Recognizing that this is basically an inexpensive reprint series, I can live with 99.99% correct. (It's inexpensive in relative terms. People who can't afford $35 because they don't have a job don't get to decide what 'expensive' is.).

I find this argument lacking for a couple reasons. Neither of these reasons are related to the snotty tone of the post.

1) First I take issue with the statement that "99.99% of the characters and objects [are] correct." It was pulled out of thin air. I don't know you and you don't know me, but I've read some of your other posts here. I routinely see you strive for a solid critique. For this reason, I find your use of this datum surprising; it's really just hyperbole disguised as a statistic. But I'll raise your rhetorical device with some paraleipsis of my own: I won't even concern myself with this first point. However...

2) Even if you could mathematically establish that 99.99% of the square footage of the book was colored correctly, that still doesn't establish a success on the part of the colorist. It is fundamental to visual design to understand that not all elements of a composition are equal. If Cosmic Boy were shown pushing a blue button when it should be red, I'd say big deal. If Phantom Girl were depicted using a green hairbrush when the original was purple, I'd agree -- who cares. But the issue at hand seems to be coloring errors related to characters that are central to both the story and to the individual compositions of panels. Try as you might to make that sound like an accomplishment, it's damn hard. When dealing with art on a page, you need style as well as quantity in order to meet with success. That's Art History 101, if not plain common sense.

So there's my perspective.

- David

IP: Logged

DStepp
Member
posted April 19, 2003 10:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for DStepp   Click Here to Email DStepp        Reply w/Quote
I am still waiting for the list myself. So far, my own inspection has only found non-toxic errors. Annoying but tolerable if they don't get worse.

99.99% of not purely a number out of thin air. I can do a rough count of objects on a page and extrapolate. It's not hard. I might be off by a touch but I will wait for that list.

I saw no error along the lines of red vs blue buttons. Indeed, the only major error I have seen is the green face on LL and that's in the background (action is in the foreground). There are a number of minor coloring flaws (There is some prediliction of coloring Ultra Boy's chest insignia the wrong color with such frequency that I wonder if it was the colorist or the printer) and there are some smearings (Sun Boy's chest insignia might be the same color as his tunic in a melee shot)but these were common in the originals. I haven't seen anything along the lines of Green Lantern picking up something Yellow with his ring or having an purple costume for instance.

Also, I dish out ridicule in appropriate measure. The art errors are annoying but calling for a re-issue or declaring you won't buy it for a few background errors is stupid, esp when you have never done it and provide no evidence that you could do a better job. Centuries of experiences has demonstrated to me that when you get people of that ilk, nothing will satisfy them so why bother? At least abusing this provides a momentary entertainment for oneself and allows you to forget what color hair brush Phantom Girl was using.

D.

IP: Logged


This topic is 17 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17 

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | DC Comics

Copyright © 2003 DC Comics
DC COMICS PRIVACY INFORMATION

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47