DC Universe     [all categories]
  DC Universe Archives
  Stop Making Archives!!! (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Stop Making Archives!!!
FOG
Member
posted February 11, 2003 08:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FOG        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by KryptoSuperDog:
Golden Age Flash: End it with the first volume. Do not let this $49.95 madness persist!


Krypto, for that most serious and grevious of blasphemies, you are hereby bannished for all eternity to the Forbidden Zone.

Gary "thus saith the Golden Age Lawgiver" O.

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted February 11, 2003 08:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
If the number of candidates dwarfes the number of slots, then some rules or guidelines need to be developed to determine what is Archivable and what is not. Without these rules, decisions will be arbitrary.

Sales alone will not work.

As James pointed out, Bob G. has said that there are "No stinkers." Bob has also stated repeatedly that no line should be considered dead except for the done-in-one Black Canary. So we have yet to find an Archive that doesn't earn a profit over time (no more than 5 years so far). Assuming that the market isn't flooded, I could probably think of at least 20 new lines that would be profitable.

DC could focus on only the most profitable lines. To some extent, this has been done by fast-tracking Legion. I have no problem with this. However, if DC publishes ONLY the most profitable Archives, we will see a line dominated by Superman, Batman, SA Flash, SA Green Lantern, yet another GL/GA and Deadman reprint and more Adams Archives. We will also see a large number of number 1s that are never that aren't continued. This is not the kind of program that I want to see.

I've spent too much time here. More tomorrow.

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted February 11, 2003 08:52 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by FOG:

Krypto, for that most serious and grevious of blasphemies, you are hereby bannished for all eternity to the Forbidden Zone.

Gary "thus saith the Golden Age Lawgiver" O.


I was wondering how long that comment was going to go without a response from you.

IP: Logged

quincyjb
Member
posted February 12, 2003 02:20 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for quincyjb   Click Here to Email quincyjb        Reply w/Quote

Ah, geez, we got serious again. My earlier post with such quips as "Stop the madness!" was intended to be humorous. Sort of like a comics fan channeling Ed Anger, or Andy Rooney. I hope I didn't step on anyone's toes.

Here's more of my thought process on why we don't need further JLA and LSH volumes. I think my arguments are basically the same as vze2's, and he expresses himself better than I do, so you may want to skip this post and go back and re-read his instead. Okay, here goes.

Given that no volume published yet has lost money, I don't see the need to go with the "safe" choices of LSH and JLA.

Realistically, the archives will end before the majority of DC's pre-Crisis material has been reprinted. Each new volume published should be viewed not only as a continuation of a line, but as a lack of continuation of other lines. Frankly, I would like to see volume 1 of any of these (Adam Strange, Challengers of the Unknown, Brave and the Bold Teamups, SA Teen Titans, Metamorpho, Metal Men, Martian Manhunter, Lois Lane, Rip Hunter, Sea Devils, Jimmy Olsen) rather than volume 13 of LSH. The cost and difficulty tracking down the issues for any of these volume 1's is ridiculously large compared to that required to find the books for LSH volume 13.

So, am I argueing that DC should quit reprinting LSH and JLA with their last archive volumes? No, not necessarily. There were some good stories in these books, and the 1970s production values were pretty bad. Reprinting these stories in a nicer package makes sense.

I would like to see these lines, and others that reach the 1970s, continue reprinting in tpbs that would not count against the annual tally of archives.

The pre-1970s material is largely klunky and dated. I say this with great fondness for the material. It makes sense for DC to publish them in ultra-expensive hardbacks that break even on sales of (just guessing here) 4200 or so. These books are going to sell mostly to an older audience looking for a nostalgia trip, with a significant chunk of change to blow on such things. The high price tag does reduce the total sales, but not to the same extent that it would if the target audience were younger.

The 1970s material will sell to a larger audience. The writing style is closer to that of modern comics. These could sell better if published in an affordable format. Some synergy with the archives line might be achieved. A fan who enjoys the affordable tpbs of a series may be motivated to cough up the big bucks to try the archives containing the preceding stories.

IP: Logged

KryptoSuperDog
Member
posted February 12, 2003 03:02 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for KryptoSuperDog        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by FOG:

Krypto, for that most serious and grevious of blasphemies, you are hereby bannished for all eternity to the Forbidden Zone.

Gary "thus saith the Golden Age Lawgiver" O.


Sorry, Gary...I got out. However, while I was there, I saw a copy of GA Flash Archives #2, 3, 4, 5, and so on. Haw haw! Bring on Legion Archives #12! Woo-hooo!

IP: Logged

FOG
Member
posted February 12, 2003 01:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FOG        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by vze2:
I was wondering how long that comment was going to go without a response from you.

Actually, I was awaiting another defender of the faith to respond.

Gary "being the Lawgiver is a lonely job" O.

IP: Logged

FOG
Member
posted February 12, 2003 01:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for FOG        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by KryptoSuperDog:
Sorry, Gary...I got out. However, while I was there, I saw a copy of GA Flash Archives #2, 3, 4, 5, and so on. Haw haw! Bring on Legion Archives #12! Woo-hooo!

Seeing those Archives in there would explain alot. I wonder if the real Bob G. wasn't somehow transported there and the one we have posting here isn't some imposter bent on making sure we never get anymore of Jay's Archives.

Gary "just kidding, Bob. Just kidding." O.

IP: Logged

profh0011
Member
posted February 12, 2003 04:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for profh0011   Click Here to Email profh0011        Reply w/Quote
"The thought of a Martin Naydel page of All-Star or even a Bob Kane Batman panel projected in 3-D is pretty funny. I'm pretty sure that line art needs to stay flat to be appreciated. But then I don't even like painted color..."

Oh yeah, I WAS trying to be funny. I was just thinking of the Death Star schematics scene in STAR WARS, the 1st time I'd seen a thing like that, and it seemed technology might be racing that way way too fast for anyone's good.

I recall complaints about the painted color in some SPIRIT reprints, and the various styles used in KS's reprints-- and how much I wound up liking the B&W art with the zips added more than any of them.

Then there was the time my printer said to me the colors on my own comic looked "flat" to him compared to the modern "norm". YEAH. I had fun putting in lots of special effects where they'd count (the Steranko influence, no doubt) but most of it was old-fashioned 60's-style bold flat solid colors-- with a 90's-computer-controlled finesse, of course!

"I'd say maybe GA Flash, or the latest Superman in Action. But that's a VERY uninformed guess."

SUPERMAN in ACTION was a bit frustrating when I got it, 'cause it made me realize just how much they'd screwed up the first time out by not including it all in one single chronological set. They got it RIGHT when they did WONDER WOMAN, though!

Golden Age FLASH was one of my favorites-- I liked it far more than the Silver Age FLASH! (But then, I've noticed for a long time that 40's DCs just seem a lot more fun and exciting and uninhibited, compared to the slicker but duller 60's DCs. (Maybe that's what happens when a comic-book company has all their employees wearing business suits and trying to act like "grown-ups" and thinking that they're better than everyone else out there, while simultaneously holding the material they produce and its intended audience in contempt... sorry, too many COMIC BOOK ARTIST and ALTER EGO articles & interviews...!)

"...for that most serious and grevious of blasphemies, you are hereby bannished for all eternity to the Forbidden Zone."

MY GOD!!! You're banishing someone to CAMDEN, New Jersey??? (That's worse than sending them to DETROIT!)

IP: Logged

CMCINTYRE3600
Member
posted February 12, 2003 05:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for CMCINTYRE3600   Click Here to Email CMCINTYRE3600        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by profh0011:

"...for that most serious and grevious of blasphemies, you are hereby bannished for all eternity to the Forbidden Zone."

MY GOD!!! You're banishing someone to CAMDEN, New Jersey??? (That's worse than sending them to DETROIT!)


On a related note, be on the look out for JLCamden, a new ongoing series by DC Comics, written by Ron Marz, set to replace the current JLA title. Watch as the new Justice League, comprised of J'onn J'onn, Plastic Man, Flamebird, the Manhunter clone, and a reformed Soloman Grundy set up up shop to clean up Camden.
Chris (from NJ and proud of it!)

IP: Logged

FOG
Member
posted February 13, 2003 01:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for FOG        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by CMCINTYRE3600:
On a related note, be on the look out for JLCamden, a new ongoing series by DC Comics, written by Ron Marz, set to replace the current JLA title. Watch as the new Justice League, comprised of J'onn J'onn, Plastic Man, Flamebird, the Manhunter clone, and a reformed Soloman Grundy set up up shop to clean up Camden.
Chris (from NJ and proud of it!)

Actually, the new title will be called JLAC and be based on a new fighting force of two men. One will be named Bud and the other Lou, who happens to hail from Patterson, NJ.

Gary "on a completely off topic note, I own all their movies - really great stuff!" O.

IP: Logged

profh0011
Member
posted February 13, 2003 03:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for profh0011   Click Here to Email profh0011        Reply w/Quote
"...set up up shop to clean up Camden."

Poor, deluded fools. They'll sink without a trace! (from one who lives there... heehee)

IP: Logged

whoswhoz
New Member
posted February 14, 2003 06:30 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for whoswhoz   Click Here to Email whoswhoz        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Sean:
WW #4 would finish with Wonder Woman #10, and Sensation Comics # 31. But since Marston continued through to Wonder Woman #28 (and beyond) and Sensation #84, that’s about 6 more Archives worth of material- material that is just as imaginative and even more accessible than his early stuff. I’d rather see all the Marston stories Archived, and to hell with the Silver Age stuff, which was all crap anyway.

Marston didn't write Wonder Woman 28. Joyce Murchison did. Marston probably wrote very little after 1945 when Kanigher took over writing all the Sensation stories. Many other people wrote Wonder Woman in this era, including Dorothy and William Woolfolk, Lee Goldsmith, Alvin Schwartz and Joseph Greene. The idea that Marston wrote every single WW until his death is just as much a myth as that Bob Kane drew all those Batman stories he signed.

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted February 15, 2003 06:53 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by FOG:
Actually, I was awaiting another defender of the faith to respond.

Gary "being the Lawgiver is a lonely job" O.


I knew your response would be more entertaining than mine.

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted February 15, 2003 06:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by quincyjb:
vze2...expresses himself better than I do, so you may want to skip this post and go back and re-read his instead.

Thanks. I followed your advice.

Just kidding.

Don't sell yourself short. I thought you expressed yourself well. I really liked your last two paragraphs and the following sentence:

quote:
Each new volume published should be viewed not only as a continuation of a line, but as a lack of continuation of other lines.

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted February 15, 2003 07:17 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
Some of what I'm going to say has been said on the Ultra thread, but I can't follow the same conversation on more than one thread. I started here, so I'll finish here.

Since it's been a while, I'll briefly recap.
I believe that the number of slots will never be large enough to reprint everything. If you disagree, you will probably disagree with everything else I say. Sales alone doesn't work.

Quality alone doesn't work either.

More importantly, DC isn't using this as the only factor. The best comics haven't been Archived (GL/GA, Deadman, Swamp Thing, Starman, and more). Keep in mind that many Archives were produced before the slipcases. Some very bad comics, primarily from the Golden Age, have been Archived.

However, quality should be a factor.

Some people have said that quality is subjective, and in general, I agree. However, I've read more than one expert say that the earlies Sunday Tarzan strips are horrible. I've also read many times that Archie's Shadow is horrendous. These comments were all made by people whose opinion I respect, including some posters on this board. In an ideal world, I'd like to read the material and make my own judgement. However, since many comics will go unreprinted and I do not have time to read them all anyway, I have no problem with experts agreeing that some material is bad.

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted February 15, 2003 07:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
Some of you may remember me using this example before.

The Hall of Fame and the All-Star team have different purposes and different rules, even though both groups are composed of great athletes. An inactive player cannot be considered for the All-Star team and a current player cannot be considered for the Hall of Fame.

I think there should be a similar division between Archives and other collected editions (which includes other hardcovers). In my opinion, one set of guidelines should be used for one group and another set of guidelines should be used for the other. Everyone in each group is competing for slots based on the same criteria. More in my next post.

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted February 15, 2003 07:50 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
Why would anyone want to buy the Quiver hardcover? It's easy to get all the back issues. As anyone who bought the Quiver hardcover will tell you, the best comics deserve the best format.

Why would anyone want to buy GA Green Lantern in hardcover? Most people will tell you that this Archive is horrible. It was certainly one of the most difficult reading experiences I've had. Yet, I bought it and will buy every GA Green Lantern volume that DC decides to publish.

People who buy GA GL aren't doing it because this is the greatest comic ever. They aren't doing it because they prefer hardcovers to floppies. These people are buying GA GL for the chance to read comics that are otherwise unavailable.

Quality is by far the most important reason to publish Quiver in hardcover, but quality is by far the least important reason to publish the GA GL Archives.

Now let's say you are at the big Archive meeting and you have to choose between Quiver and GA GL. Since the reasons for publishing each are different, this is apples vs. oranges.

IP: Logged

vze2
Member
posted February 15, 2003 08:21 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for vze2        Reply w/Quote
A lot of people say that cost and scarcity have nothing to do with their desire to buy an Archive. This is my point. These people want the best comics in hardcover and should get them.

However cost and scarcity are big factors for All-Star, GA Flash and GL. How many people would have bought these if they could easily get the original issues?

I would divide candidates into two groups: scarce, expensive comics and cheap, easy to find comics. Both groups are candidates for hardcovers. However, each group is discussed separately. Quiver never directly competes with GA GL.

The dividing line is not clear or straight. Some comics could go in either group. Legion is currently in the blurry area and near the exit. JLA is entering this area. SA Flash will get to this area somewhere around volume 10.

I'm not saying that these series have to end at these points. However, I am saying that the mission has been accomplished once we get there. Additional volumes are low priorities and should be done based on sales alone.

IP: Logged

FOG
Member
posted February 15, 2003 09:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for FOG        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by vze2:
I would divide candidates into two groups: scarce, expensive comics and cheap, easy to find comics. Both groups are candidates for hardcovers. However, each group is discussed separately. Quiver never directly competes with GA GL.

I'm not saying that these series have to end at these points. However, I am saying that the mission has been accomplished once we get there. Additional volumes are low priorities and should be done based on sales alone.


EXCELLENT POINTS, vze2! The only other thing that I would add to the equation of Archives like GA GL is historical significance in the DC Universe. In other words, I believe it can be argued quite successfully that the GA versions of the Flash and Green Lantern are two of the top five characters in the DC Universe. They are also enduring characters (heck, Alan's still alive after all these years)! They were two of the first characters to be important enough to bridge the gap to the Silver Age, and of course they continue to this day.

I would hope that despite the "poor" quality of those early titles (heck, let's face it, the majority of the GA material could be argued to be poor by many folks), that DC will consider your points on scarcity AND my point about significance to the DC Universe.

Gary "bottom line is this - these characters have been very, very, very good to DC over the years and I think that warrants heavy consideration by the committee" O.

IP: Logged

Sean
Member
posted February 15, 2003 06:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Sean   Click Here to Email Sean        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by whoswhoz:
Marston didn't write Wonder Woman 28. Joyce Murchison did. Marston probably wrote very little after 1945 when Kanigher took over writing all the Sensation stories. Many other people wrote Wonder Woman in this era, including Dorothy and William Woolfolk, Lee Goldsmith, Alvin Schwartz and Joseph Greene. The idea that Marston wrote every single WW until his death is just as much a myth as that Bob Kane drew all those Batman stories he signed.

Oh, I know Marston employed other writers; I mean that Wonder Woman was still “his baby,” in that he oversaw all his writers, was involved in the plotting, and probably had final say on her portrayal. Even after #28- I think that was the last issue he oversaw before he died- the quality of the stories remained high, since Marston stories, or those of his writers, were still appearing- sometimes intermixed with the really unimaginative stories of Robert Kanigher.

My knowledge of the later Sensation stories is less sure, but I’ve read enough of the stories appearing between ’45 and ’49 that I have a hard time believing Kanigher wrote the Wonder Woman Sensation stories from 1945-on. The stories and themes of those stories seem too “Marstonian.” Of course, this is just based on my own observations, but I sometimes I have trouble believing people can’t see the difference between a Marston story, with their cleverness and subtle humour, and a Kanigher story, which I find humourless and preachy.

Anyway, would you mind telling me where you read Joyce Murchison wrote that Villainy Inc. story? I’m really interested in Marston and his writers.

IP: Logged

Ace Arn
Member
posted February 17, 2003 03:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ace Arn        Reply w/Quote
The answer is, it seems to me, very easy. Stop making Archives when you get to the point that it's cheaper (and as easy) to buy the back issues themselves than it is to buy the Archive.

IP: Logged

James Friel
Member
posted February 18, 2003 02:52 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for James Friel   Click Here to Email James Friel        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ace Arn:
The answer is, it seems to me, very easy. Stop making Archives when you get to the point that it's cheaper (and as easy) to buy the back issues themselves than it is to buy the Archive.

I don't think that works either, Ace.
And I'm one of the strongest advocates for getting as much 1940-1965 material as possible into archives as quickly as possible.

The reasons I don't think it works is that: A) Some cheap stuff is getting pretty old, and that trend will continue--age is no longer a guarantee of high price in the back issue market. There's probably already material from the late 1960s that could be excluded by your rule.
B) lots of people don't want to collect individual issues, but want the material in hardcover. If they'll buy the volumes, why shouldn't DC produce them?
In cases where the material meets (admittedly subjective) criteria of excellence or importance (or where an archive edition of it can be expected to sell well, I think archives of recent and/or cheaply available material should be produced.
But they should be produced in addition to the regular archive production for the year in which they are published. Usually, they won't be competing for the same retail dollars as Golden Age and Silver Age volumes, and usually very little production work should be necessary, making them (relatively) quick and easy to prepare. If they don't push the older material aside--even possibly help to finance its increased production, then I say let 'er rip!

IP: Logged

Ace Arn
Member
posted February 18, 2003 12:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ace Arn        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by James Friel:
A) Some cheap stuff is getting pretty old, and that trend will continue--age is no longer a guarantee of high price in the back issue market. There's probably already material from the late 1960s that could be excluded by your rule.

So? Then don't archive it. Why spend $50 on a reprint of books that are in the quarter bins of a hundred comic shops?


quote:
B) lots of people don't want to collect individual issues, but want the material in hardcover. If they'll buy the volumes, why shouldn't DC produce them?

Can't argue with that point. But I would (politely) question the sanity of said consumers. Unless they had Donald Trump's wallet.

IP: Logged

BearPaws
Member
posted February 18, 2003 12:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BearPaws        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ace Arn:
Why spend $50 on a reprint of books that are in the quarter bins of a hundred comic shops?

The time and effort to accumulate the books I want (including the cost of gasoline, parking, and travel time) is worth far more than $50 to me and there's no guarantee I'll even find all of them on the first try. It's cheaper and easier to buy the hardcover, and a hardcover is much easier to store than bags, boards, and boxes.

------------------
"I knew I wasn't risking my secret identity with you! After all,
     if I can't trust the President of the United States, who can I trust?"
• Superman to JFK, Action Comics #309, February 1964

IP: Logged

dylanfan
Member
posted February 18, 2003 01:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for dylanfan   Click Here to Email dylanfan        Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ace Arn:
Can't argue with that point. But I would (politely) question the sanity of said consumers. Unless they had Donald Trump's wallet.

I don't think sanity has anything to do with it. For the reasons James and Bear Paws have said, I simply like the aesthetics of the Archives, and prefer them over comics. Jesus, think of all the trades and HCs I've bought over the last couple years, if I had to track down every last one of them in comic bins.

These collections suit me perfectly. I get to sit back and let DC do all the work and get the comics I want (from Golden Age Superman to New Teen Titans) in a pristine collection. I think DC and I have a great relationship working here.

------------------
Visit the Marvel Masterworks fansite and Message Board:
Go to www.marvelmasterworks.freeservers.com

IP: Logged


This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | DC Comics

Copyright © 2003 DC Comics
DC COMICS PRIVACY INFORMATION

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47